Excerpts from Part I
Framework Statements
♦
To commune with others integratively
we need to consider
that for every statement
there exists a domain
over which the statement may be said to be true,
and a domain over which it may be said to be false.
Integrative study focuses
on the domain
over which a statement is true.
♦
To think integratively
is to span
all space and time.
The living system
is revealed
through its history.
♦
The interactions
which bind together
the parts of any living system
are composed of circular (not linear)
chains of cause and effect
cycles.
Most cycles
stabilize the system;
but a certain few
called growth cycles
generate growth, transformation, innovation.
♦
♦
An information network
connects the elements
of the living system.
Within the living system
streams of information
control the flow
of matter, energy, people, money, information … .
♦
Each person
is a point
at which the universe
has become
conscious of itself;
thus, every person's life
is the story
of an awakening.
♦
Integration is life.
To live
is
to integrate.
Dis-integration
is
death.
♦
Excerpts from Part II
Chapter 2
Consider an ocean liner, a large seagoing vessel staffed by specialists of many
kinds. Among them are navigators, carpenters, engineers, pursers, electricians,
and cooks. These are fine, well trained individuals who enjoy their work, are
good at their jobs, and arise every morning eager to get to work.
But even such an excellent crew is not enough. For the ship cannot function if
everyone is left to their own devices. Numerous tasks must be performed if the
ship is to function, and these tasks must be coordinated if they are to be
productive. Some projects, for example, require carpentry; which of these should
be the first to receive the attention of the carpenters? Supplies of various
kinds must be requisitioned; what should these be, and how much of each should
be purchased? What should be the tours of duty for various crew members? . . .
And, of even greater significance, in what direction should the ship sail? And
what should be the next port of call? And why?
Clearly, the numerous specialists on board can do their work and find meaning in
it only because of some higher system which gives each of them direction. This
"higher system" consists in part of a captain who sets certain policies, makes
decisions, assigns tasks, and so on. But how does the captain know which course
the ship should steer? Obviously there is a still higher system which gives him
direction -- perhaps a corporate headquarters across the sea which determines
the route the ship is to take, what goods it is to carry, and the policies which
are to govern the internal workings of the ship.
This example has application to our lives. We sometimes see persons who are
unhappy, who appear to be falling apart; they consume drugs and alcohol, have
suicidal impulses, seem lost, depressed, and without direction. We look at them
with wonder and do not understand how they can be so unhappy when they have
"everything;" they are young, healthy, good looking, wealthy, talented,
educated, intelligent. What we mean by "everything" is that they have all that
we think necessary for life, for happiness: a healthy heart, a well stocked
mind, money . . . yet there is no meaning or happiness to their lives. They are
miserable, for they do not know in what direction they should be sailing. Either
within them, or beyond them, some higher system has been shattered or lost.
As the example of the ocean liner shows: adequate parts alone do not a viable
living system make. A crew cannot function without a captain; a captain cannot
function when there is no higher system to which decisions can be referred.
There must be some integrative matrix which binds a set of parts into a whole.
This brings us to the object of our impending journey: "Integrative Study." This
is a search for an understanding of the integrations which lie at the heart of
all forms of life -- beginning with the cell, progressing through higher levels
of life, and ending with the life of the spirit …
We will depart from the ways of analysis and the specialized disciplines to face
life in the universe (cells, multicellular organisms, societies, civilizations,
etc.) and, with the aid of light cast by scientific, philosophic, religious and
literary thought, enter upon the way of integration.
Chapter 3.
The language of integrative study is ordinary language, the language of everyday
life. In this it differs from areas of specialization, each of which possesses a
language of its own. Special languages greatly increase the efficiency of
thought and communication within a given field and are indispensable to progress
in complex fields, but have the effect of isolating practitioners in various
fields from one another. It is difficult, and often almost impossible, for
specialists from one field to communicate their results to those of another. The
language of everyday life does not suffer from this limitation: all specialists
share this language.
The language of everyday life is well fitted for the tasks of integrative study
as it performs an integrative function in society and is the principal means by
which individuals in a society are linked together. This language gradually
developed over millennia precisely to meet these needs.
Integrating is not pasting pieces together.
To bring together, in the course of working on some problem, representatives of
two or more disciplines such as psychology and biochemistry or literature and
political science, or to convene a number of specialists from various fields and
have them discuss some common problem from their different points of view, is
integration, but it is not integrative study. …
When we try to merge fields of specialization we face toward them, rather than,
as we are enjoined to do by the demands of integrative study, face toward life
in its wholeness.
As one thus turns toward the full spectrum of living forms, one turns away from
one's area of expertise (in fact, away from all areas of specialization) and
brings one's whole life experience (rather than only one of its parts) to bear
on the process of study.
Excerpts from Part III
♦
A living system
is a set of elements (parts)
together with the connections
between them.
The elements of every living system are coupled to one another by chains of
cause and effect. This must not be understood in a trivial way; from a physical
point of view every particle in the universe weakly interacts with and
influences every other particle (via gravitation, electrical forces, quantum
mechanical exchange forces, etc.). By contrast, the "connections" in a living
system tend to be strong, directed interactions. They are strong in that they
have profound effects upon their targets (as when a stream of nerve impulses
originating from the brain cause a muscle to contract); they are directed in
that the target is a specific part of the organism (as when a hormone molecule
affects only a particular tissue). The channeling of streams of communication in
all living systems (produced by nerve fibers, wires, walls, rules of privacy,
codes, languages, etc.) cause the interactions within them to be directed.
A "policy" is the description of a connection in a social system. Every
activity, every gesture in a traditional culture is symbolic and meaningful, and
serves to bind the community together.
When a system is broken down into its parts, what is lost is the information
regarding the connections. An automobile is a set of parts plus the information
regarding their interconnection. Thus, the statement "the whole is greater than
the sum of its parts" is neither romantic nor mystical. The "more" refers to the
connections. …
Imagine a box containing resistors, capacitors, transistors, wires, nuts and
bolts, etc.; it contains parts, the elements of a system, yet it is not a
system. A designer who connects the parts so as to form a television receiver is
able to forge them into a unity capable of detecting delicate vibrations in the
ether and converting these into sight and sound. The connections create the
television receiver; with a different set of connections some of the same
elements give rise to an electronic computer.
The collection of cells obtained by disaggregating a mouse is a collection of
cells, not a mouse; a heap of parts is not a car; a mass of individuals is not
necessarily a society, nor do several persons living in the same household
necessarily constitute a family.
♦
The living system
Is a set of elements (parts)
together with the connections
between them.
The parts
of the defective system
can be perfect;
the parts
of the effective system
can be imperfect.
A single faulty connection can cause an entire electronic
instrument to fail.
It has been said that, to banish evil from the world, we must first banish
evil from our hearts: a good society is one constituted of good people. Yet
societies which pride themselves on the quality of their civilization and on the
uprightness of their citizens can perpetrate crimes of astonishing scale.
Everyone does their duty and, in one corner, impelled by the entire weight of
the society, human beings are degraded, tortured, and killed. The upright
citizen facilitates and amplifies both the good and the evil in his or her
society.
Systems of any degree of perfection can be constructed of components of any
degree of imperfection. To compensate, the more imperfect the components, the
greater the number which must be connected in parallel with each other to
achieve a given level of perfection. The quality of a human group often depends
more upon the relationship among its parts than upon the quality of its parts.